Welcome to the November 2016 edition of the Spry Roughley Report.
As we are now completing tax returns it is worth a reminder about the Research and Development Tax Incentive. Despite our legislators' constant fiddling with the concession, the R&D incentive remains a valuable concession, especially for companies with less than $20M turnover, as the incentive is refundable and converts any tax losses into a cash refund. For 30 June balance date companies, the 2016 R&D claim must be lodged with AusIndustry by 30 April 2017.
As you may be aware, the R&D tax incentive applies to the first $100 million of eligible R&D expenditure. Eligible R&D expenditure in excess of $100 million is deductible at the company tax rate only. I also note that the applicable rates for the R&D concession have been adjusted by 1.5% to 43.5% and 38.5%, effective from 1 July 2016. The proposed back-dating of that change has been dropped.
Corporate governance is increasingly important to private entities as we all grapple with increased regulation and a more litigious society. Lots of business stakeholders, both internal and external, have rights and the law makes it easier for those aggrieved to uphold those rights. Entities that neglect to formalise the key governance issues as they are identified may face particular difficulty. In particular we are seeing more businesses paying attention to more formality around related party agreements (leases, loans, employment arrangements, concessions and suchlike), shareholder agreements, and where the family members are involved in a business, family constitutions.
The purpose of documenting such arrangements and relationships is to have all parties involved in a business or venture agree on key issues and how they will behave in the future; that provides a forward thinking and considered approach to the arrangements rather than having to react to an unanticipated situation or event when they inevitably occur. Agreements of course can also be legally binding providing a measure of certainty to everyone's position. Unfortunately, where these arrangements are not documented, stakeholder disputes are usually more complicated, costly, and emotionally fraught.
I hesitate to again mention the superannuation changes which are now in draft legislative form substantially as announced, however the Government has decided to retain the work test for making contributions between ages 67 and 74 and to remove the proposed limited ability to catch up on utilising unused concessional contribution limits. The Parliament is not so friendly but we do hope the legislation will be finalised and passed into law soon to provide certainty for all of us!
In a further development the Tax Office have clarified their views on non arms-length income and limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBA) in self managed superannuation funds. This situation may arise where a LRBA is not on arm's length terms (i.e. commercial terms) such as having a 0% interest rate loan. The Tax Office have provided an extended grace period for non-complying borrowings to be re-structured by 31 January 2017. This is very significant issue due to the potentially adverse tax consequences to the fund if the arrangements remain uncommercial. If you have any concerns regarding your SMSF borrowing arrangements, please contact us urgently.
And now for some more detail and other news…
As usual, please do not hesitate to call us on (02) 9891 6100 should you wish to discuss how any of the points raised in the report specifically affect you, or click here to send us an email.
Martin Roughley, Director
Spry Roughley Services Pty Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
The Federal Government has been consulting on draft legislation to give effect to most of its 2016–2017 budget superannuation proposals. Here are some of the key changes.
Deducting personal contributions
All individuals up to age 75 will be able to deduct personal superannuation contributions, regardless of their employment circumstances. Of course, such deductible contributions would still effectively be limited by the concessional contributions cap of $25,000, proposed from 1 July 2017.
Pension $1.6 million transfer
The total amount of accumulated superannuation an individual can transfer into retirement phase (where earnings on assets are tax-exempt) will be capped at $1.6 million from 1 July 2017. Those with pension balances over $1.6 million at 1 July 2017 will be required to "roll back" the excess amount to accumulation phase by 1 July 2017 (where it will be subject to 15% tax on future earnings).
Concessional contributions cap
This cap is to be reduced to $25,000 for all individuals (regardless of age) from 1 July 2017. The concessional cap will be indexed in increments of $2,500 (down from $5,000 increments). Contributions to constitutionally protected funds and untaxed or unfunded defined benefit superannuation funds will be counted towards an individual's concessional contributions cap. However, any excess concessional contributions in respect of such funds will not be subject to tax, but instead limit the individual's ability to make further concessional contributions.
Note that the Government has decided to:
- dump the proposed $500,000 lifetime cap on non-concessional contributions (which would have been backdated to 1 July 2007) – instead, the lifetime cap will be replaced by a reduced non-concessional cap of $100,000 per year for individuals with superannuation balances below $1.6 million;
- not proceed with the proposal to remove the work test for making contributions between ages 65 and 74; and
- defer to 1 July 2018 the start date for catch-up concessional contributions for superannuation balances of less than $500,000.
The government says it intends to introduce the proposed changes in Parliament "before the end of the year". It remains to be seen if the changes will pass smoothly through Parliament. In any case, it would be prudent to check in with your professional adviser to see if and how the proposed changes would affect your retirement savings strategy.
Learn more about this...
Legislation has been introduced in Parliament that proposes to allow primary producers to access income tax averaging 10 income years after choosing to opt out, instead of the opt-out choice being permanent. The Federal Government says this will assist primary producers, as averaging only recommences when it is to their benefit (ie they receive a tax offset) and they can still opt out if averaging no longer suits their circumstances. The changes are proposed to apply for the 2016–2017 income year and later income years.
Primary producers have to meet basic conditions to be eligible for income averaging. Please contact our office for further information.
Learn more about this...
The Federal Government has reduced the rates of the tax offset available under the research and development (R&D) tax incentive for the first $100 million of eligible expenditure by 1.5 percentage points. The higher (refundable) rate of the tax offset has been reduced from 45% to 43.5% and the lower (non-refundable) rate of the offset has been reduced from 40% to 38.5%. Here are some relevant points to note:
- Eligible entities with annual turnover of less than $20 million, and which are not controlled by an exempt entity or entities, may obtain a refundable tax offset equal to 43.5% of their first $100 million of eligible R&D expenditure in an income year, and a further refundable tax offset equal to the amount by which their R&D expenditure exceeds $100 million multiplied by the company tax rate.
- All other eligible entities may obtain a non-refundable tax offset equal to 38.5% of their eligible R&D expenditure and a further non-refundable tax offset equal to the amount by which their R&D expenditure exceeds $100 million multiplied by the company tax rate.
The changes apply from 1 July 2016.
AusIndustry and the ATO manage the R&D tax incentive jointly. The R&D tax incentive aims to offset some of the costs of undertaking eligible R&D activities. A company must lodge an application to register within 10 months after the end of its income year. Please contact our office for further information.
Learn more about this...
The ATO has issued a taxation determination (TD 2016/16) concerning whether the ordinary or statutory income of a self managed super fund (SMSF) would be non-arm's length income (NALI) under the tax law, and therefore attract 47% tax, when the parties to a scheme have entered into a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA) on terms which are not at arm's length.
The ATO has also updated a practical compliance guideline (PCG 2016/5) which sets out the Commissioner's "safe harbour" terms for LRBAs. If an LRBA is structured in accordance with the guideline, the ATO will accept that the LRBA is consistent with an arm's length dealing and the NALI provisions (47% tax) will not apply. Trustees who do not meet the safe harbour terms will need to otherwise demonstrate that their LRBA was entered into and maintained consistent with arm's length terms.
The ATO has allowed a grace period to 31 January 2017 for SMSFs to restructure LRBAs on terms consistent with the compliance guideline's safe habour terms (or bring LRBAs to an end before that date). Please contact our office for further information.
Learn more about this...
An individual has been unsuccessful before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in a matter concerning certain deduction claims for work-related travel expenses. The individual was a sheet metal worker whose home was located some 60 km from his employer's main work site. The individual made a number of work-related deduction claims. However, after various concessions made by both the individual and the Commissioner of Taxation, the remaining issue between the parties was whether the taxpayer was entitled to a deduction for work-related travel expenses.
The man argued that his employer required him to supply his own tools and that they were too bulky to be transported to work other than by car. He also questioned whether his employer provided secure storage facilities for his tools. In refusing the taxpayer's claim, the Tribunal noted it was the taxpayer's own admission that it was his own personal choice to transport his various hand tools out of security concerns. The Tribunal also said the taxpayer's security concerns were "not supported by objective evidence". The taxpayer's claim was therefore refused.
The ATO reminds individuals to make sure they get their deductions right. In certain circumstances it will contact employers to verify employees' claims. In this case, the ATO contacted the taxpayer's employer to check his claims, including whether the employer supplied safe storage facilities.
Learn more about this...